Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Дата
Msg-id 200306050823.47088.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Folks,

Last we talked (before the mail server went down) Tom had agreed in principle 
to a re-ordering of postgresql.conf.sample and the "Run-Time Configuration" 
docs page based on the attached ordering file.

I would like to make this happen before feature-freeze on June 15.   To do 
that, I need more info:

1) Are any additional changes expected for GUC.c before feature-freeze?

2) Are all of the new GUC.c variables for 7.4 already documented in the CVS 
docs?  If not, can the responsible parties send me descriptions so that I can 
doc it?

3) Do people want me to take a stab at re-ordering GUC.c as well (that is, 
Tom's idea of having the GUC.c ordering alphabetical within each variable 
type), considering that I am not a C programmer?

4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: UPDATE ... SET = DEFAULT
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Aggregates containing outer references don't work per