Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
Дата
Msg-id 200302192153.h1JLrnA14845@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one  (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
mlw wrote:
> >I raised the possibility of moving the pid file only last week.  Tom
> >pointed out that it acts as a lock on the database to prevent two
> >postmasters' trying to manage the same database.  As such it should NOT
> >be a configurable parameter.
> >
> This is a different PID file. Sorry, this one is specifically for FHS 
> systems. The postmaster.pid file, as used by PostgreSQL remains in the 
> data directory.

Uh, how does this work if you don't do an FHS install --- where does it
put this FHS postmaster.pid file?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mike Aubury
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Следующее
От: Tilo Schwarz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy]