I'm not sure what abort would have to do with what I am talking about. The
point is that a SQL exception should not require rollback on the previous SQL
calls in the same transaction.
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 11:58 am, Jean-Luc Lachance wrote:
> Bruce,
>
>
> I assume one will be able to ABORT the current transaction without
> aborting the higher transaction and ABORT ALL to abort all if needed.
>
>
> What syntax will be available to the upper transaction to detect a lower
> ABORT?
> While there be something à la Java ( try catch)?
>
>
> JLL