Re: RFC: listing lock status
| От | nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RFC: listing lock status |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020719141105.GA20920@klamath.dyndns.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: RFC: listing lock status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:30:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > My opinion on this point is (a) pgxactlock locks are special and should > be shown specially --- in the form of "xact a waits for xact b"; Not sure how that would fit into a UI based on returning sets of tuples. > I can fathom no reason at all that anyone would have > the slightest use for a displayer that arbitrarily omits some locks. I agree. I think a reasonable solution is to have the low-level SRF return data on both pg_xactlock locks and locks on system catalogs. If the DBA wants to disregard one or the other, it should be pretty easy to do (particularly pg_xactlock). Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: