Re: timeout implementation issues
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200204100027.g3A0R1929901@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: timeout implementation issues (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > Oops does the first mean rolling back the variables on abort ? > > > If so I made a mistake. The current is better than the second. > > > > The second means all SET's are rolled back on abort. > > I see. > BTW what varibles are rolled back on abort currently ? Currently, none, though the SET commands after the query aborts are ignored, which is effectively the same as rolling them back. BEGIN WORK;SET x=3;failed query;SET x=5;COMMIT; In this case, x=3 at end of query. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: