Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too
Дата
Msg-id 200202012257.g11MvxG03697@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Syscaches should store negative entries, too  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > Actually, that is not our standard comment.  We want to give people a
> > limited set of meaningful options.  If then want billions of options,
> > they should use Oracle.  :-)
> 
> In that case we have to decide for the user for which case we optimize
> and give user suboptimal performanse for the _other_ case.

If we can't decide, and it is significant, we have to give any option,
but only if both are true.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Array aggregation. Was: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too