Re: USING HASH considered harmful?
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: USING HASH considered harmful?
Дата
Msg-id
200108170159.f7H1x2919714@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
USING HASH considered harmful? (Stephen Robert Norris)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
USING HASH considered harmful? Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>
Re: USING HASH considered harmful? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: USING HASH considered harmful? Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>
Re: USING HASH considered harmful? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: USING HASH considered harmful? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE -- Start of PGP signed section. > We've just discovered a rather nasty feature of hashes, namely that > simultaneous reads & writes to a single row will deadlock if there > is a hash index on the table. > > I guess this is because PG really has to lock the hash table entry in > both cases. It does, however, make HASH indices completely useless for > any table that you might want to update. > > Is this a known feature? Yes, I have heard about this problem. Would you test btree vs hash and report back which is faster. I have requested this from >20 people and no one reported back. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления