Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:29:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org> writes:
> > i imagine it would be architectually difficult to have seperate user/group
> > tables per database.
>
> Codewise it would be trivial --- remove 'em from the list of shared
> relations.  From the point of view of backwards compatibility, however,
> that's not likely to happen.

where are these relations?  is this a compile-time thing, or can it be done
on-the-fly?

--
[ Jim Mercer        jim@reptiles.org         +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]