New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Дата
Msg-id 200105021735.f42HZbY16618@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
Список pgsql-hackers
I was talking to a Linux user yesterday, and he said that performance
using the xfs file system is pretty bad.  He believes it has to do with
the fact that fsync() on log-based file systems requires more writes.

With a standard BSD/ext2 file system, WAL writes can stay on the same
cylinder to perform fsync.  Is that true of log-based file systems?

I know xfs and reiser are both log based.  Do we need to be concerned
about PostgreSQL performance on these file systems?  I use BSD FFS with
soft updates here, so it doesn't affect me.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Fsync Slashdot discussion
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()