Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200101091802.NAA17888@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Can this now be marked as done? > > * Modification of pg_class can happen while table in use by another > > backend. Might lead to MVCC inside of syscache > > I'm not sure. Do you have any record of what the concern was, in > detail? I don't understand what the TODO item is trying to say. I assumed it was the problem of table lookups with no locking. No idea what the MVCC mention is about. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: