Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum
| От | Joe Slag |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20000721144219.A23144@isis.visi.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | RE: dramatic slowdown in selects after pg has been runni ng for a while (patrick.wolf@Aerojet.com (WOLF, PATRICK)) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum
Re: Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum |
| Список | pgsql-novice |
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 12:36:35PM -0700, WOLF, PATRICK wrote:
> Try running vacuum on the table or the database. Here's an excerpt from the
> man on vacuum:
>
[snip]
>
>
Thanks to all who responded. I vacuumed out foo, and sure enough
the select time is down to 10 seconds again.
I see in the docs the suggestion:
We recommend that active production databases be VACUUMM-ed nightly
Is this how people tend to do their vacuuming? Does anyone do programmatic
vacuums instead of / in addition to a nightly run? Is vacuuming mainly
necessary after big deletes, or are there other common situations
requiring it?
Joe Slag
Wagpaw, Inc.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: