Re: Why Not MySQL?
| От | Marten Feldtmann |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why Not MySQL? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200005031757.TAA03161@feki.toppoint.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why Not MySQL? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@huntsvilleal.com> writes: > > Well, there's still a cost to having a lot of seldom-used indexes, > because the planner has to sit there and consider whether to use each > one for each query. So I'd still recommend looking at your mix of > queries and only creating indexes that match reasonably commonly-used > WHERE clauses. > When doing insert/updates on larger tables (>500.000 entries) these indexes are also time consuming ! For our vertical attribute object storage systems we noticed, that the time for insert/updates are the critical part - they behave very linear in our test suite and they seem to be the limiting factor in our system. Marten
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: