Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch

> > Hmm. Further perusal leads me to believe that this override is a
> > standards extension, as the clause about the tablename being unique in
> > the current namespace does not have an exception for temporary tables.
> > Nothing wrong with that, just making it clear. What's the use/case for
> > this feature? Does it come from some other DMBS?
> 
> I am quite surprised people don't like that feature, or at least one
> person doesn't.  If someone else creates a table, it should not prevent
> me from creating a temporary table of the same name.
> 
> I know Informix doesn't implement it that way, and they complained

Sorry, I should have said "One of my users complained..."

> because a program started not working.  Research showed that someone had
> created a real table with the same name as the temp table.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026