Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
От
Guillaume Smet
Тема
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Дата
Msg-id
1d4e0c10702200003m3a71b4ceia17963c35952af1c@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements daveg <daveg@sonic.net>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
On 2/20/07, Tom Lane wrote: > Of course, the other side of that coin is that syslog is known to drop > messages altogether under sufficient load. (At least on some platforms; > dunno about yours.) Yes I know. That's one of the reason why I asked for the bahaviour of 7.4 log_duration back in 8.2. It's a good compromise which allows us not to lose lines and have a good level of information (at least, the best we can have). Async IO helps. Moreover we use syslog to send the log lines via UDP so we know that it's not perfect. But it works nice most of the time. We know that we can't log every query (we use a combination of log_duration and log_min_duration_statement - I patched 8.1 for that) because if we do so we lose a lot of lines and queries are not consistent but we can't do it locally with stderr anyway due to I/O. This method has been reliable for more than a year and our daily reports are consistent. -- Guillaume
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления