Re: really lazy vacuums?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: really lazy vacuums?
Дата
Msg-id 1CA5FCA1-5E17-44F6-8A7D-02B24C104D61@nasby.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: really lazy vacuums?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: really lazy vacuums?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mar 16, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> It
> would be really nice (for this and for other things) if we had some
> way of measuring the I/O saturation of the system, so that we could
> automatically adjust the aggressiveness of background processes
> accordingly.

Has anyone looked at the overhead of measuring how long IO requests to the kernel take? If we did that not only could
weget an idea of what our IO workload looked like, we could also figure out whether a block came out of cache or not.
Thatinformation could potentially be useful to the planner, but even if the database couldn't use that knowledge itself
itwould be a damn useful statistic to have... IMHO, far more useful than our current hit rate statistics. 
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Chinese initdb on Windows
Следующее
От: Radosław Smogura
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache