RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Mount
Тема RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release
Дата
Msg-id 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70BF67@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
It looks like it may be an idea now, as for some reason, some parts of
the 6.5.3 JDBC driver isn't in 6.5.3?

We had a similar problem with 6.5.2, so before 6.5.3 was released, I
checked CVS to make sure the changes were there, and they were. It's
just that I've seen several references recently (the most recent from
Assaf this morning) about the protocol version being 1.0. The 6.5.3
driver was the first version not to use 1.0! eek.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 5:45 AM
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: [HACKERS] 6.6 release


There have been some people who have said they want a 6.6 release with
beta to start on February 1.  They are Tom Lane, Thomas Lockhart, and
myself.  Jan and Peter Eisentraut have said they will be ready on that
date.

Seems foreign key ability would be enough to justify a 6.6.

Comments?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania
19026

************


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Mount
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [INTERFACES] Transaction support in 6.5.3/JDBC
Следующее
От: Peter Mount
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release