> Peter,
>
> I have just finished up some other stuff in the backend, and I was
> wondering what to do next. My personal list include a cleanup of the lo
> type. Specifically:
>
> 1. Assign a fixed OID to the LO type so that attributes of this type
> can easily be identified.
>
> 2. Write a VACUUM LO procedure.
>
> 3. Extend/verify the existing internal lo functions to work with the
> new type.
>
> I know that more can/should be done in this area, but I only have so much
> time. I am aware the you have done some work on this in the contrib area.
> Were you planning on handling any (or all) of these issues as part of the
> 6.4 base release? I will gladly move on to something else.
>
We should also make a large object type, rather than using inv_ to
identify it. It is on the TODO list, and I can implement it whenever
you want.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)