Re: pg_primary_conninfo

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Dec 28, 2010 3:58 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What's the use case?  And aren't there security reasons to NOT expose
>> that?  It might contain a password for instance.

> Good point - should be made superuser only.

I'm still wondering what's the actual use-case for exposing this inside
SQL.  Those with a legitimate need-to-know can look at the slave
server's config files, no?
        regards, tom lane