Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS
Дата
Msg-id 19477.1287150779@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote:
>> I don't particularly see a problem with having GPL'd contrib modules.

> I think that's a bad idea for all kinds of reasons.

Yeah.  From my viewpoint as a downstream packager, it creates a mess.

We've spent a great amount of effort and cajolery over the years to make
sure that the Postgres sources, including contrib, are uniformly
licensed.  We're not going to abandon that policy.

I have no idea whether Red Hat could be persuaded to relicense
pg_filedump.  It might be worth asking though.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: extensible enums