Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19405.1286386827@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it would be cleaner to get rid of checkTmpCtx() and instead
> have dispell_init() set up and tear down the temporary context,
What I was thinking of doing was getting rid of the static variable
altogether: we should do what you say above, but in the form of a
state struct that's created and destroyed by additional calls from
dispell_init(). Then that state struct could also carry the
infrastructure for this additional hack. It's a little more notation to
pass an additional parameter through all these routines, but from the
standpoint of understandability and maintainability it's clearly worth
it.
> void NISetupForDictionaryLoad();
> void NICleanupAfterDictionaryLoad();
More like
NISpellState *NISpellInit();NISpellTerm(NISpellState *stat);
> ...but I don't really see why that has to be done as part of this patch.
Because patches that reduce maintainability seldom get cleaned up after.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: