Re: PQescapeBytea on Win32

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Doesn't this duplicate a function that we already invented for PQnotify
>> structs?

> What do you recommend?  Do we depricate PQfreeNotify?

I dunno.  In hindsight it was shortsightedly named.  But I don't suppose
we want to tell people to use "PQfreeNotify" to free the result of
PQescapeBytea ... so deprecation seems to be the order of the day.

Do we really want "PQfreemem" either?  Maybe it should be "PQfree"?
        regards, tom lane