Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes:
> In fact, I think it is so bad, that I think we need to back-port a fix to
> previous versions and issue a notice of some kind.

They already do issue notices --- see VACUUM.

A real fix (eg the forcible stop we were talking about earlier) will not
be reasonable to back-port.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Hallgren
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SPI_finish and RegisterExprContextCallback
Следующее
От: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around