Re: Lazy xid assignment V4

"Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> However, none of these are very strong reasons - certainly weaker than
> doing what ensures to cause the least confusion. I'm therefore
> starting to think that we should remove transaction, and keep the name
> virtualtransaction for the VXID. That will ensure that clients who
> *do* rely on pg_locks and the "transaction" column (which will be few,
> I guess) at least fail early and visibly, instead of producing bogus
> results...

Barring other objections, I'll do it that way.

            regards, tom lane