Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18343.1219200008@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> I'd still like to see us adopt the proposal from some time ago where
> we stop commenting out the parameters at all, but short of that,
> hiding options seems about the worst choice we could make.
Well, there seems to be a very substantial body of opinion that says
we *do* need to hide "uninteresting" options. How many are
"interesting" is certainly open to debate, but as far as I can tell
most people think it's a short list, not "all of them".
In short, you're in the minority.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: