Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
Дата
Msg-id
18306.1154189609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation (Alistair Bayley)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation "Alistair Bayley" <alistair@abayley.org>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation "Alistair Bayley" <alistair@abayley.org>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
"Alistair Bayley" writes: >> Magnus, did you have a specific reason for choosing Europe/Dublin, >> or was it just alphabetically first? Europe/London looks at least >> marginally closer to what one would think "GMT" means: > Does it have to be a specific city? I'd rather it just chose GMT. The fact that there is an entry for "GMT Daylight Time" means that Windows' idea of this time zone is not pure GMT. Or is the translation table entry a complete work of fiction? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления