Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Дата
Msg-id 18144.1307472949@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> Before you arrived, it was quite normal to suggest tuning patches
> after feature freeze.

*Low risk* tuning patches make sense at this stage, yes.  Fooling with
the lock mechanisms doesn't qualify as low risk in my book.  The
probability of undetected subtle problems is just too great.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks