Re: Transaction Id wraparounds
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Transaction Id wraparounds |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18077.1031242084@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Transaction Id wraparounds (Amin Abdulghani <amin@quantiva.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Transaction Id wraparounds
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Amin Abdulghani <amin@quantiva.com> writes:
> From the administrator's guide I understand a
> system wide VACUUM or VACUUM FREEZE would perform the job
> but for a large database (>10GB and growing) this takes a
> long time to run.
So? You don't have to do it often, and it doesn't lock your
tables against normal operations ... so I don't really see the
objection. I would not bother with FREEZE unless you are trying
to make a template database.
> what should be the criteria to check when this issue needs
> to be addressed.
When age(datfrozenxid) approaches 2 billion, it's time. I believe
vacuum will start warning you well before that.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: