Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000
Дата
Msg-id 18004.916240587@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] postgres and year 2000  (Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it> writes:
> It is nice to provide smart date interpretation in the backend but in
> order to be really Y2K compliant we *MUST* forbid any ambiguous date
> format in the backend.

Why?  Has some bureaucrat somewhere defined "Y2K-compliant" as meaning
"thou shalt stop accepting 2-digit years"?  I have not heard of any
such definition and I am entirely prepared to ignore it if it exists...
it has nothing to do with reality.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] CONSTRAINTS...
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY