Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Дата
Msg-id 1792.1171215045@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto  ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>)
Ответы Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Список pgsql-hackers
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> writes:
> How about a rule that says no new ode without a test?

We've got way too many tests like that already, ie, a bunch of
mostly-redundant functional tests of isolated new features.
Most of the code I worry about there isn't any simple way to
test from the SQL level --- the fact that a query gives the
right answer doesn't prove it went through a particular part
of the planner, for example.

I think we need some intelligent test design, not tests thrown in
to meet a rule.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Hideyuki Kawashima"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HOT for PostgreSQL 8.3