Re: Propose a new function - list_is_empty
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Propose a new function - list_is_empty |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1754766.1660744099@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Propose a new function - list_is_empty (Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Propose a new function - list_is_empty
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> writes:
> There are some places that add extra parenthesis like here
> while (list_length(sortclause) > list_length(previous) &&
> - list_length(new_elems) > 0)
> + (new_elems != NIL))
> Is it necessary to add that extra parenthesis?
I'd drop the parens in these particular examples because they are
inconsistent with the other parts of the same "if" condition.
I concur with Daniel's point that parens can be useful as a visual
aid even when they aren't strictly necessary --- but I don't think
we should make future readers wonder why one half of the "if"
is parenthesized and the other isn't.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: