Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17186.1299079680@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> writes: > On 02/03/11 14:25, Robert Haas wrote: >> But does bumping the ref count then create a leak the rest of the time? > Not really, because you never want to garbage collect the spiexceptions > module (just like you don't want to GC th plpy module, or the plpy.info > function etc.). So the reference count of that module should never drop > to zero, but apparently on some machines it does. So just reffing > artificailly is kind of a valid solution, I'm just uneasy with not > knowing why it fails on some machines and does not on others. Yeah, that last point makes me nervous too. A look into the Fedora repository shows that the python version shipped in F13 is rather heavily patched: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/f13/master;hb=refs/heads/f13/master It's not clear to me which of their changes from a stock build might be at issue, though, and even less clear whether they introduced a bug or did something to expose a bug of ours. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: