Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:42 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
>> Can Pg be changed to support "." in operator names as long as they don't just
>> appear by themselves? What would this break to do so?
> Someone else would have to comment on that.
DOT_DOT is already a token in plpgsql; trying to make it be also an
operator name would break a lot of existing plpgsql code.
regards, tom lane