Re: User-friendliness for DROP RESTRICT/CASCADE
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User-friendliness for DROP RESTRICT/CASCADE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16383.1025130608@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User-friendliness for DROP RESTRICT/CASCADE (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: User-friendliness for DROP RESTRICT/CASCADE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> It would be nice if the recursive dependency checking function was
> available as an end user function too, so you could analyze dependencies
> before even trying to drop something, or even just to understand a
> database schema you've inherited from someone else.
It'd be a pretty trivial exercise to build something that looks at the
pg_depend entries and generates whatever kind of display you want.
David Kaplan reminded me that there is another UI issue to be
considered: when we *are* doing a DROP CASCADE, should the dropped
dependent objects be reported somehow? As it stands, Rod's patch emits
elog(NOTICE) messages in this case, but I am wondering whether that will
be seen as useful or merely annoying chatter.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: