Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF
От
Pavel Stehule
Тема
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF
Дата
Msg-id
162867790711301018y3d036823u3b96730c344756da@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF (Cultural Sublimation)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PL/pgSQL and SETOF Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation@yahoo.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation@yahoo.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
On 30/11/2007, Cultural Sublimation wrote: > > I would guess you're calling it like: > > > > SELECT get_items2(); > > > > whereas, you should call set returning functions like: > > > > SELECT * FROM get_items2(); > > Hi, > > Yeah, that was the problem -- thanks! > > But still on that subject: is my version of get_items2 the simplest > that is possible in PL/pgSQL? It seems awfully verbose compared to > the SQL version... > no. Your simplest version is historic relict and is available only in sql language. I am not sure, maybe in C language too. Pavel > Regards, > C.S. > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления