Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Дата
Msg-id 16217.1122063543@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Looks like the CRC calculation work isn't the issue.   I did test runs of
> no-CRC vs. regular DBT2 with different checkpoint timeouts, and didn't
> discern any statistical difference.   See attached spreadsheet chart (the
> two different runs are on two different machines).

Um, where are the test runs underlying this spreadsheet?  I don't have a
whole lot of confidence in looking at full-run average TPM numbers to
discern whether transient dropoffs in TPM are significant or not.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC