Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Neil Chen
Тема
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens
Дата
Msg-id
161156428867.8805.10514003990986531276.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
Implements feature:       tested, passed
Spec compliant:           not tested
Documentation:            not tested

Greetings,

Although I am not an expert in this field, I carefully read the full-text search section in the document. I think the change is surprising, but yes, it is correct.
I found that your patch didn't modify the regress/excepted/tsearch.out. So I updated it and carried out the regression test. It passed. Also, I manually executed some test cases, all of which were OK.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: iwata.aya@fujitsu.com
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: libpq debug log
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
FAQ