Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15533.1501696711@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table
Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partitiontable |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> --restore-via-partition-root ?
> I worry someone will think that pg_dump is now restoring stuff, but it isn't.
Well, the point is that the commands it emits will cause the eventual
restore to go through the root. Anyway, I think trying to avoid using
a verb altogether is going to result in a very stilted option name.
I notice that the option list already includes some references to
"insert", so maybe "--insert-via-partition-root"? Although you could
argue that that's confusing when we're using COPY.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: