Re: RULE regression test fragility?

Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> [ patch for \a\t mode in rules and sanity_check output ]

Committed with some minor adjustment of the comments.

>> +1 (but what are those silly parens in pg_seclabels definition?),

> That's because it contain several UNION ALLs and ruleutils makes sure
> the order is correct.

That looks weird to me too, but it's surely not the fault of this patch.
Maybe we should take a look at exactly what ruleutils is doing there.
        regards, tom lane