Re: moving FE->BE encoding conversion
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: moving FE->BE encoding conversion
Дата
Msg-id
15136.1028727893@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
moving FE->BE encoding conversion (Tatsuo Ishii)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
moving FE->BE encoding conversion Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: moving FE->BE encoding conversion Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: moving FE->BE encoding conversion Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: moving FE->BE encoding conversion Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: moving FE->BE encoding conversion Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > Since the encoding conversion now looks up database, it must be > done within a transaction. I still think that this is a fundamentally unworkable design. How will you deal with reporting errors outside a transaction, or for that matter inside an already-failed transaction? ISTM the conversion function *must* be kept as a persistent state variable, with an initial default of "no conversion", and the actual setting done via a SET command (which can do the lookup inside a transaction). Then you can use the current conversion function without any assumptions about transaction state. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления