Re: pg_freespacemap question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_freespacemap question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14469.1141831668@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_freespacemap question (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_freespacemap question
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> writes:
>> Good points! I had not noticed this test case. Probably NULL is better
> Would setting it to 'BLCKSZ - (fixed index header stuff)' be better,
No, I don't think so, because that will just make it harder to recognize
what's what (remember that BLCKSZ isn't really a constant, and the index
overhead is not the same for all AMs either). The point here is that
for indexes the FSM tracks whole-page availability, not the amount of
free space within pages. So I think NULL is a reasonable representation
of that. Using NULL will make it easy to filter the results if you want
to see only heap-page data or only index-page data, whereas it will be
very hard to do that if the view adopts an ultimately-artificial
convention about the amount of available space on an index page.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: