Re: Slow dump with pg_dump/pg_restore ? How to improve ?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Slow dump with pg_dump/pg_restore ? How to improve ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14354.1088643935@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Slow dump with pg_dump/pg_restore ? How to improve ? (Soeren Gerlach <soeren@all-about-shift.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Slow dump with pg_dump/pg_restore ? How to improve ?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Soeren Gerlach <soeren@all-about-shift.com> writes:
> * pg_dump takes 2/3 of the [single] CPU, postmaster the other 1/3 for both
> dumps
Really!? Hmm, that seems fairly backwards ... thinks ...
In the -Fc case this makes some amount of sense because pg_dump runs
gzip-style compression on the data (which is why the output file is
so much smaller). But for plain text dump, pg_dump should be just
pushing the data straight through to stdout; it really ought not take
much CPU as far as I can see. There may be some simple performance
glitch involved there. Are you interested in recompiling with -pg
and getting a gprof profile of pg_dump?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: