Re: ITYM DROP TABLE

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Done that way (9.0 and beyond).

Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical
problem: the following sentence says
      It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>      overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.

which was okay when "it" referred to "ALTER TABLE", but now that there
are two commands mentioned in the previous sentence, it doesn't match.
Perhaps "These commands also avoid the ...".
        regards, tom lane