Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Дата
Msg-id 13766.1581725936@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Jiří Fejfar <jurafejfar@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I also object because 20 is *my* unlucky number ...

Not sure how serious Andrew is being here, but it does open up an
important point: there are varying opinions on which numbers are unlucky.
The idea that 13 is unlucky is Western, and maybe even only common in
English-speaking countries.  In Asia, numbers containing the digit 4
are considered unlucky [1], and there are probably other rules in other
cultures.  If we establish a precedent that we'll skip release numbers
for non-technical reasons, I'm afraid we'll be right back in the mess
we sought to avoid, whereby nearly every year we had an argument about
what the next release number would be.  So let's not go there.

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraphobia



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Standards compliance of SET ROLE / SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION
Следующее
От: Ashwin Agrawal
Дата:
Сообщение: Use LN_S instead of "ln -s" in Makefile