Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Дата
Msg-id 1361374105.73929.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Materialized views WIP patch  ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>)
Re: Materialized views WIP patch  ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:

> I suppose one should be able to expect that if one finds a view
> in the information schema, then one should be able to use DROP
> VIEW to remove it.  Which in this case wouldn't work.  So I don't
> think including a materialized view under views or tables is
> appropriate.

Right.  I think adding pg_matviews covers the stated use-case
enough to answer Erik's concern.  I'm not going to mess with adding
non-standard stuff to the standard views.

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON Function Bike Shedding