Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of vie jul 13 18:11:27 -0400 2012:

> Regarding the lock_timeout functionality: the patch can be reduced to
> about half of its current size and it would be a lot less intrusive if the
> LockAcquire() callers don't need to report the individual object types
> and names or OIDs. Do you prefer the verbose ereport()s or a
> generic one about "lock timeout triggered" in ProcSleep()?

For what it's worth, I would appreciate it if you would post the lock
timeout patch for the upcoming commitfest.  This one is already almost a
month long now.  That way we can close this CF item soon and concentrate
on the remaining patches.  This one has received its fair share of
committer attention already, ISTM.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support