On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
> >
> > --xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically
> > enable -x?
>
> How's this?
I wouldn't make -x and -X exclusive. The way I understood this is, -x
means include xlog, and -X says how to.
I guess either way of looking at it has its merits.