Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment
Дата
Msg-id 13340.1538453286@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:22 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (I think we could drop the savepoint
>> too, no?)

> One advantage of keeping the savepoint is that we don't need to
> explicitly drop the objects which we have created temporarily for this
> test.

They'll go away anyway at the end of the transaction that the whole
script is wrapped in.  (But it might be worth choosing slightly less
generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests
later in that script.)

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive andanti-wraparound ru