Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs
Дата
Msg-id
1327600881.26839.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Ответ на
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
On mån, 2012-01-09 at 14:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> #ifdef CATALOG_VARLEN           /* variable-length fields start here
> */
> 
> to be even clearer.
> 
> What would be appropriate to add instead of those inconsistently-used
> comments is explicit comments about the exception cases such as
> proargtypes, to make it clear that the placement of the #ifdef
> CATALOG_VARLEN is intentional and not a bug in those cases.
> 
I implemented your suggestions in the attached patch.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Следующее
От: Vik Reykja
Дата:
FAQ