Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Дата
Msg-id 1308199236.30501.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On ons, 2011-06-15 at 22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (FWIW, I've come around to liking the idea of using =~ and the obvious
> variants of that for regex operators, mainly because of the Perl
> precedent.)

Maybe I'm not completely up to date on this, but I observe that Perl
itself doesn't appear to have a commutator for =~ .

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users