Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1288032709.9047.5.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:54 -0400, James Cloos wrote: > >>>>> "JD" == Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > > JD> 2. Fix the input/output functions in a special mode for dump/reload, > JD> to make them true inverses. > > That can be done by supporting the %A printf(3)/scanf(3) format. I don't happen to see a %A format in the man page, but I doubt the output would look like a timestamp. And if it doesn't look like a timestamp, it violates the spirit of a logical dump of the data. We could just base64-encode the binary and print that, but that doesn't maintain the spirit of a logical data dump either. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: